fujix ds-300 manual

5 fps, but only 3 frames.), direct printing and a SCSI connection (D-sub 25-pin) to a PC. My camera came with one of these. Don't need it, butAs if this wasn't enough, the manual even states that the DS-300 can be connected to a GPS, to record longtitude and latitude. This was 1997. Amazing! The optical viewfinder is less than perfect (to say the least), but does the job. Changing many common settingsA little plasticly, perhaps, but nice. Once again: amazing! Don't be fooled by the original price tag. This was cutting edge technology some 10 years ago (in the late 1990's), but not any more. Do yourself a favour and buy a modern camera instead. Find a cheap one and have fun!For more info and alternative views on the DS-300 visit one of these sites. In a moment, you'll discover that it couldn't be In a moment, you’ll discover that it couldn’t be easier to use. And a glance at the image quality will tell you that the performance and resolution are comparable to those of our most advanced digital SLRs. So see for yourself what the DS-300 can do. And discover the power of the digital imagination. All pictures on this page were taken with the DS-300. Shooting information is on the back cover. FUJIX Digital Camera. You’ll be pleasantly surprised to find the image quality is close to the results you get with silver-halide film. Until you see it for yourself, that might sound impossible, but the DS-300 was created to make you a believer. Fujix (FujiFilm) DS-330 is a semi-professional 1.3 megapixel digital cameraImages can be recorded as. Exif-JPEG with three different compression settings or in uncompressed TIF format.F11 (F19T), and consists of nine elements in nine groups. Focus range is 1.3ftYou can manually focus by dialing in the distance toThis is useful for minimizing the shutter lag timeThe LV-D3 uses two.

• fujix ds-300 manual.

It was also marketed at the same time by Fuji's medical equipment partner Xerox as the Xerox XD-530.It does contain a LCD panel on top of the camera for displaying camera settings. A analog composite video output is available on the unit and the suggested method for connecting a preview screen. Compatibility may not be as good but SmartMedia and CompactFlash can also be used with the appropriate adapter. The back of the camera has a window to view the type of Fuji PC card. Images are formatted in JPEG and TIFF formats. A serial port (Mini Din9) is provided to transfer images onto a computer. Nikon E2 and E2S) DSLR models (source: 1997 Fujifilm DS-300 brochure).If you're not looking too carefully, the DS-300 resembles Fujifilm's own medium format rangefinder cameras. It's a handful, but I like it. In the field, it's like shooting film. You won't see your photos until you get back home and put the PCMCIA memory card in the computer. Conveniently, the photos are stored as standard JPEG or TIFF files, making them easily accessible more than a decade later (unlike the proprietary files crated by some of the early digital cameras). MostBut - if you're feeling lucky - you can also dig out your old Compact Flash cards and test them with a PCMCIA adapter. I've tried a handful of old CF cards. Much to my surprise, the only one that worked was a newer (relatively speaking) 128 MB TwinMOS card. Older 16, 32 andNo surprises there. Admittely, I haven't bothered testing the TIFF output. But with only 1280x1000 pixels you can't afford to throw many of them away.Click on the sample photo above to see the unedited JPEG (325 KB) straight from the camera. You get the point. (As a side note, it's interesting to see how all the sample photos posted on Fujifilm's own web site have been downsized.) The camera is very responsive compared to most other of the early digital models. You can also mount an external EU-D3 extension unit, which offers continuous mode shooting (4.

They may be placed to create a profile of your interests and show you relevant advertisement on other sites. If you disable these cookies, you will have less targeted advertising. I had been looking for these rare cameras for a while now. They interest me because of their size and performance.I don't find this an issue, a quick cross reference indicates that the Fuji NP-510 battery might actually be a simple, common Sony NP-F550 battery. I have those batteries and the charger for the batteries. However, there is the chance that those batteries DO NOT WORK. I had two batteries and the charger for my Sony Mavica MVC-FD7, so I didn't need to buy any. Although I own three DS-330 cameras, I won't use more than one a time anyways. There are memory chips on both sides of the board and controllers. There is a CCD board which I may examine at a later time, every board is connected through either ZIF (zero insertion force) flex cables or mezzannine connectors, there are some wires on normal pinned connectors for what looks like power and basic data like hotshoe connections. Internally, the camera looks very well constructed and very old, the chips are large and harken to a different time, they look power hungry and slow, think 486. Turn the TOP dial to SETUP and use the rear control wheel to scroll through settings. Hold the SET button and scroll when you reach a setting you want to change. There is an internal battery that must be replaced, or upon turning the camera on, it will beep three times. With the memory grip attached, make sure you attach the grip on firmly, or else the camera will return an ERROR. The grip should also be set to OFF rather than SCSI or CONT. This camera, first shown at Photokina in 1996, was quite a break from the 'normal' digital cameras of that era. Here you can also see the optical viewfinder, which is located just above the PCMCIA slot.

AA-size batteries as its power source, the EU-D3A is powered directly fromWhen the LCD monitor is mounted on the hot shoe you can still plug a strobe intoFuji NC-300D, NC-500 and PG-3000 printers.That's automatic, programmed AE, apertureYou hold in the Set button and rotate the selector dial to change optionsMost camera features and settings are changed usingSadly, the IBM microdrive does not. To improve your experience, we use cookies to remember log-in details and provide secure log-in, collect statistics to optimize site functionality and deliver content tailored to your interest. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to do this. For more information you can read our Privacy Policy. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device. It does not usually directly identify you, providing you with a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your privacy, you can choose to disable some types of cookies. If you click on the category headings, you can find out the detail of each category and change the settings. However, please note that blocking some of cookies could impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Privacy Policy They are usually only placed in order to respond to your request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can change your browser’s cookie setting to block these cookies, but then some parts of the site will not properly function. By measuring them, we are able to know how much popular each page is and understand how visitors move around the site. All information collected through these cookies is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you disable these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services are added to our websites. If you disable these cookies, these services may not work properly.

While some users created wireless remote control and slide show applications, others ported video games, including DOOM. I would imagine that gameplay on that tiny LCD would've been difficult. It even had a microphone, allowing you to add voice captions to your photos. I had one of those and wrote a review of it at the time, should you wish to see a copy (jpg). Instead, an implication that apple was the first, which it wasn't - neither for digital cameras nor consumer digital cameras. Like 0 Aug 29, 2013 permalink MKvip Beauty he he, I used to own a MVC-CD1000 with the CD-Rs - I still have a hundred or so lying around gathering dust somewhere. The cam was nice, but what I didn't realize before I bought it is the fact it didn't have a write buffer - unbelievable. You had to wait after EVERY SINGLE shot until the data was written to the CD:-( But it produced a real nice picture quality for the time. Like 2 Aug 28, 2013 permalink guyfawkes I still have its smaller sibling, the CD-500. A bit of a palaver to format discs (Sony advised placing the camera on a flat surface to and to avoid vibration during the process) and then finalising the disc. But apart from this, the IQ and especially white balance were outstanding for the period. Like 0 4 months ago permalink peterblaise My digital firsts: scanned film and prints on an HP ScanJet IIc in the late 80s or early 90s (?), used Panit Shop Pro, and never went back to the chemical darkroom. Like 0 Aug 28, 2013 permalink eric burrows A history of DSLR's would be interesting. I still have shots taken with my first, a Minolta RD175. 3 CCD's and a whopping 1.75 Mp. Since then I have tried a lot more. Like 2 Aug 28, 2013 permalink guyfawkes I have the later RD3000, in mint condition and fully working, and with a full set of Vectis lenses, including the mirror lens, but sadly not the rare 17mm. Within the constraints of 2.7mp the images it produces are remarkably sharp.

What this meant is that you could go out and take photos, and then connect the LCD later (via a video cable) to compose and review your photos. According to the manual, the LCD didn't show the image you were composing until the shutter release was halfway-pressed. The EI-C90 could record JPEGs or TIFFs, and save them to either its 2MB of built-in memory, or to a PCMCIA card. I'm glad that trend didn't last long. But that's not what makes it notable. You could add an electronic viewfinder (shown above), but otherwise you would use the optical viewfinder. While it's not easy to see in the photos, the DS-300 was also gigantic, measuring 153 x 96 x 78 mm (6.0 x 3.9 x 3.1 in.). The camera had a 'Super Hybrid Autofocus System', which combined passive, active, and CCD-based AF. The lens wasn't as remarkable, with a maximum aperture range of F3.5-5.6 and an equivalent focal range of 35-105mm. It didn't just support JPEG - this puppy could save images as TIFFs, as well. The camera's serial port (remember those?) is how you connected to your PC, or a GPS receiver, if you were lucky enough to have one in 1997. An added bonus of the extension units: a SCSI port. Seriously. It was essentially a PCMCIA card with a lens and sensor attached. A battery pack that could hold four AA cells fit snapped onto the camera when you were out taking pictures. The yellow button in the middle was actually the shutter release. Photos weren't very large, since the CCD had just 330,000 pixels. The F4 lens was had a fixed focal length of 52mm, and you composed your photos through an optical viewfinder (no LCD here). The viewfinder had two framing guides inside - one for 'normal' shooting and another for macro. Digita didn't last for very long, but it allowed the user to create 'scripts', which could automate camera functions. One shows the number of pictures remaining, while another for setting the image quality setting - both things you wouldn't expect to need a script for.

Some used cables and TWAIN API, some had proprietary libraries, and some used disks or PC cards -- it was a huge pain. But insurance adjusters fell in love with these early digital cameras, because it meant no more daily trips to get film developed, which meant they could process more claims each day and therefore earn more. Like 0 Aug 23, 2013 permalink CanadianCoolpix Since it goes up to the year 2000, I would have included the Olympus C-2100 UZ. This camera was way ahead of its time. It had everything, including a 10X optical zoom with stabilization. Electronic viewfinder. Like 4 Aug 22, 2013 permalink Brian Steele Agreed. It took many seconds to scan the images.around 20-60 seconds, so you had to sit very still.:-) I can't recall what it was, and I was just a kid. That was 1999, but I had followed digital cameras for a year before buying one - when the various sites were just coming online. The key reason I bought it was that the quality and resolution had reached that tipping point where you could take a picture, crop and scale it and it would look really good on a 1280x1024 monitor, or print it at 10x8 and be quite pleased with it. The C3040Z had an amazing feature set, and when I gave it away to a friend who was very poor but very keen to try digital photography, there were many features on the Olympus that my replacement camera, a Canon A710IS, lacked. I enjoyed it immensely. My first digital camera was actually an Apple QuickTake 100, which shows you how old I am. Like 0 Aug 22, 2013 permalink fortwodriver I still have a Casio QV-10A and the proprietary cable and even the power-cube so you could use it without batteries. We also had a Sony thermal video printer we could plug it into with an RCA video cable. I powered the camera up the other day - it still works - barely. After a while QV-10 cameras had an issue with their sprung sliding on switch. The camera would randomly switch off. Fixed, thanks.

I was shooting with medium format at the time as was less than impressed with the quality but just loved the fact that you could go straight to a document and insert the image instantly. Like 1 Aug 22, 2013 permalink NilTox HI, I still have mine, fully boxed. I remember my son using it in a Primary School project (had to collect signs and logos), he photo'd them and printed them out via our Mac Performa. The teacher rejected the project because he'd used a digital camera and computer!! Like 0 Aug 28, 2013 permalink Ian Hell 1997 we saw the release of the Nikon Coolpix 100, I remember it well, dealers were frightened by the thought of digital cameras, now look. Nikon had also released some years before the Nikon E2 and E3 what a Dinosaurs they were fantastic era, but my how technology has moved on. The camera took Nikon MF lenses, it was just very slow to download images. Canon were really no where at this time. Like 1 Aug 22, 2013 permalink gordzam Check Canon Here in 1996: Like 0 Aug 22, 2013 permalink Ian There was also a Coolpix 300, it had a write on screen and voice notes with each image, the sad point is that penlight batteries did not last more than about one hour and then were very hot and very flat Like 0 Aug 22, 2013 permalink Ian I actually think that the Coolpix 100 was a lot arlier than 1997 and certainly the E2 and E3 were 1993 ish as this was a memorable period in my life Like 0 Aug 23, 2013 permalink BrianCaylor I'd like to have seen the Gameboy Camera accessory on the list. As a kid, that was my first digital camera. Like 1 Aug 22, 2013 permalink Greg Henry I think the Olympus 2100 UZ deserves the award though for one of the best cameras of that time period. I still have one today that works perfectly and while I really don't use it, will always keep it for the sake of nostalgia. Excellent zoom, lens, and features for that time.

I don't know if your RD175 was the same, but the 3000 was fast to focus with virtually no lag, but it took ages to write an image to its CF card. It has a buffer of about 5 images, but this merely extends the write time considerably. It's big and boxy and best used on a tripod. ISO choice is very limited: it's 200 or 800. Like 0 4 months ago permalink pedroboe100 What, no Canon digital Elph. I think it was made by Epson. I still have pictures taken with it. Like 0 Aug 26, 2013 permalink guyfawkes Edward, Do your images not display any Exif data when you open them up. This could indicate which camera you had. Like 0 Aug 27, 2013 permalink Dennoman There were no Epson digital cameras in 1992. Like 0 Apr 23, 2015 permalink Francis Carver Re.I gave away 2, still have the 3rd one someplace. Actually, what we got was the QV-10A model that had a larger LCD screen, could take VGA resolution images, had a larger internal memory, and also had a 2-setting lens -- normal and tele. Would love to find one that makes this much sense today. Like 0 Aug 25, 2013 permalink guyfawkes Thanks for the article. An interesting trip down memory lane. I started off digital with a Canon G2 in 2002 and in the past couple of months decided to acquire, purely for their historic interest, three Mavicas - a floppy only FD71, what I term the intermediate type using a floppy and memory card, the FD200, and finally the 5 meg CD500 and which is the one that arouses most interest when I show it to friends. The IQ of the CD500 with its Zeiss Vario Sonnar lens I prefer to the Canon G5 that I upgraded to from the G2. In fact I also prefer its IQ to that of the 5 meg Sony DSC-V1 with which it was contemporaneous. The bulk of the CD500 isn't an issue for me today, but its very slow operational speed is. But it is great fun to use. Like 1 Aug 25, 2013 permalink Perry Carmichael Kodak DC20 had no rear LCD. My very first digital camera and I still have it. No options, no modes, no reviews.

Just shoot until the light came on and you were done. Only held 8 0.2mp images. Those were the days. I remember using it on a trip with my son to Yellowstone. I was very selective of what I shot with it so I could make a calendar for his mom. (Scanning film was too expensive then, for me at least.) Like 0 Aug 24, 2013 permalink Jim Salvas The floppy disc Mavicas and eBay came along at the same time and were meant for each other. Before that, eBay was the text-based AuctionWeb, but once pics from a relatively cheap and very easy to use camera were possible, the service burst out of its seams. They became so entwined that years after the Mavicas were obsolete it was still nigh impossible to separate a dedicated eBay seller from his Sony. It was a perfect camera for the application. The low resolution was no problem for on-screen pics and the great macro results went beyond expectations. And those floppies. god, how the ebayers loved those floppies. Like 1 Aug 23, 2013 permalink sigala1 The Mavica may seem stupid today, but remember that computers from the 1990s didn't have USB ports, and prior to Windows XP in 2001, even if your computer did have a USB port, it didn't work unless you installed drivers for it, which probably required you to type in cryptic DOS commands. So recording to floppy disk was a creative solution from Sony. Steven Sasson invented the first digital camera in 1975. ( while he was working for Kodak) It weighed 8 pounds (3.6 kg) and had only 0.01 megapixels. The image was recorded onto a cassette tape and this process took 23 seconds. His camera took images in black and white. Back in the mid-90's, I worked with many of these early digital cameras, integrating them into a system for mobile insurance adjusters (think hurricanes) to submit fully electronic claims (with photos) to the insurance companies. Each camera had its own unique method of getting photos onto the computer.

It included those little extras that were considered high-end then like a beam to help the focusing, threaded lens for filters, and image stabilization. And back then camera makers only came out with 3-4 new models per year, max, and took the time to test the stuff before shipping it out - today they use consumers as testers who report bugs and glitches that have to be fixed with firmware later. A different time, for sure. I knew this was the wave of the future and that film would be left in the weeds sooner or later (just didn't think it would happen as fast as it did!). I remember tuning them out for two reasons: they were so damn expensive for what you got, and they didn't have a flash hotshoe or PC contact so I couldn't use them in my studio.I remember having a deep sense of joy and anticipation when the early digitals began sporting hotshoes and maybe a PC contact. Like the Canon Sureshot G1 and G2 and Kodak 280 (I think). The price was still prohibitive. Then Canon with it's landmark D30, D60, 10D and finally 20D brought digital down to earth. Like 0 Aug 22, 2013 permalink fpapp I think the Olympus C-211 deserves mention. A friend had one back in the day, and I remember thinking it was such a cool camera to have the ability to print instant photos from the digital files.Like 0 Aug 22, 2013 permalink Jeff Keller Don't worry, the C-211 will be in part 2! Thanks for the trip down memory lane, Jeff. To those complaining about how ugly or unconventionally shaped these cameras are, please consider: In this first wave of digital cameras, designers struggled with limitations in storage, battery, and display technology that made it difficult to package digital cameras in compact shapes. The odd, bulky physical designs were created out of engineering necessity, not as a product of some misguided desire to discard conventional design the sake of being different.

I expect that Part 2 will illustrate how, by 2001, digital camera technologies had been refined enough that manufacturers were able to produce consumer level cameras shaped like traditional compacts, that could fit in a jacket pocket. You'll see a design convergence across the industry in the early 2000s. Like 4 Aug 22, 2013 permalink J Parker Another suggestion for part 2 -- the Pentax Optio S. It was so small that you could use an Altoids tin as a camera case (which is exactly what Pentax did when they revealed the camera at 2003's Consumer and Electronics Show). Like 0 Aug 21, 2013 permalink Paul P Boyd That was an amazing little camera. I was a teacher at the time and it was brilliant for taking pictures of students work and print out to put into their portfolios to show progression. Fond memories that is until another teacher borrowed it and had it stollen, not so fond a memory Like 0 Aug 22, 2013 permalink Expat Nomad I was drooling over a Minolta Vectis RD-3000 at this stage of the game, having the S-1 system. Fun (expensive) stuff.Like 1 Aug 21, 2013 permalink DukeCC I always liked the Sony Mavica with the floppy drive. I used one at work quite a bit. It p!ssed me off when they went to the CD-R! Like 0 Aug 21, 2013 permalink RKGoth No mention of the EPiX Pro.Like 0 Aug 21, 2013 permalink Ocolon Correction for the Mavica part of the article: A CD-ROM isn't writable by definition, ROM standing for read-only memory. I even had an add-on lens or two for it.OUCHES! haha. still in use at that old studio up until just a couple of years ago lols.The batmobile camera. The camera still works good as new (aside from the battery cover which won't stay shut). I got around it (somewhat) by using the video cable to download the images as a movie into Sony Vegas so I could extract individual frames. Like 0 Aug 21, 2013 permalink Scales USA My First Digital Camera was a Fujiifilm MX-700 that I bought in 1998. 2.2 mp, and for the time was among the best.

We had a Olympus C-860L. A battery eater, but it was a great camera. I replaced the Fujifilm with a Nikon CP-990, and later with the first Canon Rebel DSLR. A few years ago, I bought a used Kodak DCS460D from 1995. Like 1 Aug 21, 2013 permalink Simon97 I bought an Epson PhotoPC in early 1996. I chose it over the QV-10 because it had 640x480 resolution over the QV-10's 320x240. It had 640x480 resolution, had a proprietary interface card that was installed in the computer's internal expansion slot. It made very good pictures for the resolution but it was very expensive. Hard to believe that was over 20 years ago now. Like 0 Aug 21, 2013 permalink Richphoto Perhaps one of the most important cameras for the pro photohrapher was the Kodak DCS460. Many pros cut their digital teeth on that one. Still have that, of course. I still have one of those in my collection. Like 2 Aug 21, 2013 permalink Wodheila Still have my Fuji 'MX500' (1.5MP) that used those SmartMedia cards. Like 0 Aug 21, 2013 permalink Fogsprig Call me crazy, but I've bought Oly C2100 three months ago. Works amazingly great for me. Like 3 Aug 21, 2013 permalink Sony's RX10 III goes the distanceDespite a couple of quirks, we think it's a camera that photographers and non-photographers alike will find fun to use. 1416 Sony a7C initial review: Compact size, big sensor image quality first impressions Sep 15, 2020 at 01:00 Sony's a7C is among the smallest full-frame mirrorless cameras you can buy, and in terms of core capability, not much has been sacrificed for the sake of compactness. But are you ready to make it your next go-to travel camera. Find out how it stacks up in our initial review. 475 Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 initial review first impressions Sep 2, 2020 at 14:00 The Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 is a full-frame mirrorless camera but in a body smaller than the Micro Four Thirds GH5.

It includes updates to Panasonic's DFD autofocus system, creative photo modes, and video features that come close to matching the more expensive S1H. 330 Nikon Z5 initial review review Sep 1, 2020 at 13:00 Nikon's new entry-level mirrorless full-framer feels anything but entry-level. And it may well be the model best positioned to convert remaining F-mount holdouts to Z-mount. 1224 Canon EOS R6 Review: not the hybrid king, but a great photographers' camera review Aug 26, 2020 at 14:40 The Canon EOS R6 doesn't quite live up to the full promise of its do-everything specs, but it's a great photographers' camera. We've selected seven cameras ranging from compacts to full-frame, all of which are easy to operate. Best enthusiast long zoom cameras Sep 16, 2020 at 00:41 Long-zoom compacts fill the gap between pocketable cameras and interchangeable lens models with expensive lenses, offering a great combination of lens reach and portability. Read on to learn about our favorite enthusiast long zoom cameras. Best video cameras for photographers Sep 13, 2020 at 12:00 Most modern cameras will shoot video to one degree or another, but these are the ones we’d look at if you plan to shoot some video alongside your photos. We’ve chosen cameras that can take great photos and make it easy to get great looking video, rather than being the ones you’d choose as a committed videographer. Best cameras for travel in 2020 Sep 9, 2020 at 02:15 What's the best camera for travel. Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best. The best lenses for Sony mirrorless cameras Sep 4, 2020 at 22:15 Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.

So we took it to the track, to see how it performs. Sep 20, 2020 123 sample gallery Sony a7C sample gallery (DPReview TV) Our team at DPReview TV spent the week shooting with the new Sony a7C. Check out the photos from their review of the camera, including many taken with the new 28-60mm F4-5.6 kit lens. Sep 19, 2020 183 sample gallery Sony announces plans to end camera sales and manufacturing in Brazil next year Amid challenging and changing market conditions, Sony has announced that many of its consumer electronics divisions, including the camera division, will cease operations and exit Brazil in 2021. The images show 'the spirit, the mood, the hopes, the fears and the feelings of the nation' as the coronavirus outbreak took hold of the country. But does it work? And how are the results. Sep 18, 2020 91 Breakthrough announces first third-party EF to RF Drop-In Filter Adapter About a month after announcing a wide array of drop-in filters for the Canon EF-EOS R Drop-In Mount Adapter, Breakthrough Filters has announced its own competitor to the Canon adapter, the Breakthrough EF to RF Drop-In Filter Adapter. But what's it like to use, and how does it stack up against Sony's own a7 III. Watch our full review to find out. Sep 18, 2020 356 video Fujifilm releases version 2.0 update for its X Webcam utility, brings on-screen settings control Fujifilm X Webcam utility for macOS and Windows computers can now control a number of settings directly from your monitor when the camera is plugged into your computer. Sep 17, 2020 51 Canon announces next generation IVY CLIQ cameras with built-in printers Two new cameras in Canon's 'printer-built-in' range that produce 3x2in prints and have those all-important selfie mirrors.